Cognitive Psychology Exam 4

Last update by Brooke on 04/28/2013
71777 People have viewed this Quiz
  • Share

Describe the Interactionist Approach to parsing.

In the Interactionist Approach to parsing, semantics come into play early as the sentence is being read. Parsing is influenced both by the meaning of words and by environmental setting. For example:
"The spy saw the man with the binoculars."
--2 interpretations. parsing determines how sentence is read.
"The bird saw the man with the binoculars."
--only 1 interpretation usually made, because we know that birds do not use binoculars.

View Cognitive Psychology Exam 4 as Flashcard Deck

Related Quiz Content
  • neverreal777
    Describe the procedure, results and conclusion of the Trueswell et al. (1994) experiment on parsing.
    Procedure: Participants read sentences containing words that did or did not semantically constrain the associated subjects.
    1. "The evidence examined by the lawyer was useless."
    --only the lawyer can examine, so semantically constrained.
    2. "The witness examined by the lawyer was useless."
    --not semantically constrained
    Reading speeds were measured for both sentences.

    Results: Reading speeds were faster for sentences with constrained verbs than with verbs that were not constrained.

    Conclusion: Semantic constraints make it easier to process sentences.
    Supports the idea that semantics are used to guide parsing early in the process (Interactionist Approach).
  • neverreal777
    What is a nested structure?
    Nested structures are clauses embedded within clauses.
  • neverreal777
    What do nested structures tax? Why?
    Working memory is taxed because extra information must be held in place before important information is reached.
  • neverreal777
    Describe the procedure, results and conclusion of the MacDonald & Just (1989) experiment with negation.
    Procedure: Participants read sentences that did or did not contain a negation word:
    "During the contest Michelle completed no puzzles but only mazes before the buzzer."
    Participants were then shown a word that followed the negation (ie. "puzzle") and asked if the word was in the previous sentence.

    Results: Words preceded by "no" took longer and were less accurate to recognize.

    Conclusions: Negation may reduce accessibility of teh concepts in the mental represention.
    ie. puzzles is temporarily ignored.
  • neverreal777
    Describe the procedure, results and conclusion of the Henry, Miller & Beazley (1995) experiment with passive voice.
    Procedure: Participants read mock news reports that were written either in the passive or active voice. They then rated victim harm and perpetrator responsibility, as well as their attitude toward sexual violence (scale 1-7).

    Males only attributed less victim harm and less perpetrator responsibility when written in the passive voice.
    Both males and females reported greater acceptance of violence against women when written in the passive voice.

    Conclusion: Suggests that percpetion of harm was influenced by grammatical order of words.
  • neverreal777
    Name the 3 levels of text representation.
    surface level, textbase and situation model
  • neverreal777
    Describe the surface level of text representation.
    The surface level of text representation is the activation of words. Ie. if a word is misspelled.
  • neverreal777
    Describe the textbase level of text representation.
    Textbase is the activation of the words and their meanings, with no additional information.
  • neverreal777
    Define situation model.
    A situation model is a mental representations of the meaning of the text, along with additional ideas related to the text and inferences, which are derived from previous knowledge.
  • neverreal777
    Describe the procedure, results and conclusion of the Zwaan et al. (2003) experiment with situation models and picture representations.
    Procedure: Participants read sentences, and indicated whether the picture had been mentioned in the preceding sentence. The position of the animal changed with place. The independent variable in this experiment was whether the picture matched the sentence (if an eagle is flying in sentence, has wings spread in the picture).

    Results: Faster responses when picture matched the sentence.

    Conclusion: People activate perceptual symvols during sentence comprehension.
  • neverreal777
    Describe the procedure, results and conclusion of the Kaschak et al. (2006) experiment with motion and comprehension.
    Procedure: Participants listened to sentences that described motion while simultaneously viewing visual stimuli which depicted movement in either the same or the opposite direction as that in the sentence. Participants then judged whether the sentence made sense.

    Results: Faster responses for sentences describing motion in the opposite direction of that in the sentence.

    Conclusion: Simulating motion during comprehension uses the same neural pathways as visual perception.

    Also, we represent movement when we hear sentences.
Cognitive Psychology Exam 4
Cognitive Psychology Exam 4
Total Views: 71777
Relevant questions for exam 4
Teams This Deck Belongs To
Deck does not belong to any team.